IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/tkp/tiim13/s2_239-244.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Inter-Organizational Relationship and Innovation Performance in Electronic Supply Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Jao-Hong Cheng

    (National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan)

  • Chih-Ming Lee

    (National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan)

  • Mu-Chung Chen

    (National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan)

Abstract

Purpose - To address this important issue in supply chains, this paper presents a research model to examine the factors influencing the innovation performance and implementation in electronic supply chains. Methodology– We analyze data collected from 252 of the top 1000 Taiwanese manufacturing firms in 2011 listed by Business Weekly. Our research model comprises two research hypotheses with three constructs, including institutional orientation, relational benefits and innovation performance. The hypotheses are tested via an empirical study of electronic supply chains. Findings - The findings demonstrate that electronic supply chain members should reinforce their relational benefits and institutional view of relational governance so as to improve their innovation performance for achieving competitive advantage of electronic supply chains Value - Our results show that relational benefits improving the positive effect of institutional orientation on innovation performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Jao-Hong Cheng & Chih-Ming Lee & Mu-Chung Chen, 2013. "Inter-Organizational Relationship and Innovation Performance in Electronic Supply Chains," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    • Handle: RePEc:tkp:tiim13:s2_239-244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-07-9/papers/S2_239-244.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Longwei & Yeung, Jeff Hoi Yan & Zhang, Min, 2011. "The impact of trust and contract on innovation performance: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 114-122, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liming Zhao & Haihong Zhang & Wenqing Wu, 2019. "Cooperative knowledge creation in an uncertain network environment based on a dynamic knowledge supernetwork," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 657-685, May.
    2. Huo, Baofeng & Fu, Dijia & Zhao, Xiande & Zhu, Jingwen, 2016. "Curbing opportunism in logistics outsourcing relationships: The role of relational norms and contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 293-303.
    3. Shahid Rasool & Asif Ayub Kiyani & Fadilah Binti Siali & Hiram Ting & Mahani Mohammad Abdu Shakur, 2017. "Consumer Innovativeness in Consumer - Company Relationship and Mediating Role of Consumer Value: An Empirical Study of Cell Phone Users in Pakistan," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 379-388.
    4. Huo, Baofeng & Ye, Yuxiao & Zhao, Xiande, 2015. "The impacts of trust and contracts on opportunism in the 3PL industry: The moderating role of demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PA), pages 160-170.
    5. Hu, Shan & Yu, Yongze & Fei, Qingyu, 2023. "Social credit and patent quality: Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    6. Gilles Grolleau & Naoufel Mzoughi & Sanja Pekovic, 2015. "Environmental management practices: good or bad news for innovations delivering environmental benefits? The moderating effect of market characteristics," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 339-359, June.
    7. Joanita Kataike & Xavier Gellynck, 2018. "22 Years of Governance Structures and Performance: What Has Been Achieved in Agrifood Chains and Beyond? A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-32, March.
    8. Griessmair, Michele & Hussain, Dildar & Windsperger, Josef, 2014. "Trust and the tendency towards multi-unit franchising: A relational governance view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2337-2345.
    9. Zheng, Lu & Ulrich, Klaus & Sendra-García, Javier, 2021. "Qualitative comparative analysis: Configurational paths to innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 83-93.
    10. Yunhui Zhao & Chuanli Zhao & Yi Guo & Hongyan Sheng & Taiwen Feng, 2021. "Green supplier integration and environmental innovation in Chinese firms: The joint effect of governance mechanism and trust," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 169-183, January.
    11. Zhang, Min & Zhao, Xiande & Qi, Yinan, 2014. "The effects of organizational flatness, coordination, and product modularity on mass customization capability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 145-155.
    12. Nunzia Carbonara & Roberta Pellegrino, 2020. "The role of public private partnerships in fostering innovation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 140-156, February.
    13. Chi, Maomao & Zhao, Jing & George, Joey F. & Li, Yanhui & Zhai, Shanshan, 2017. "The influence of inter-firm IT governance strategies on relational performance: The moderation effect of information technology ambidexterity," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 43-53.
    14. Ángela González-Moreno & Pablo Ruiz-Palomino & Francisco J. Sáez-Martínez, 2019. "Can CEOs’ Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation Improve Firms’ Cooperation in International Scenarios?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Zhang, Min & Zhao, Xiande & Voss, Chris & Zhu, Guilong, 2016. "Innovating through services, co-creation and supplier integration: Cases from China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P2), pages 289-300.
    16. Hemmert, Martin & Kim, DaeSoo & Kim, Jisun & Cho, BooYun, 2016. "Building the supplier's trust: Role of institutional forces and buyer firm practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 25-37.
    17. Yang, Jie & Yu, Guangsheng & Liu, Mingyu & Xie, Hongming & Liu, Haiwei, 2018. "Disentangling the impact of cost transparency on cooperation efficiency in exchange partnerships," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 27-34.
    18. Mishra, Deepa & Sharma, R.R.K. & Kumar, Sameer & Dubey, Rameshwar, 2016. "Bridging and buffering: Strategies for mitigating supply risk and improving supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 183-197.
    19. Fang, F., 2019. "When performance shortfall arises, contract or trust? A multi-method study of the impact of contractual and relational governances on performance in public – private partnerships," Other publications TiSEM 473840ee-6945-4a93-9326-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Um, Ki-Hyun & Kim, Sang-Man, 2019. "The effects of supply chain collaboration on performance and transaction cost advantage: The moderation and nonlinear effects of governance mechanisms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 97-111.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tkp:tiim13:s2_239-244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maks Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.toknowpress.net/conferences .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.