IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/undchp/978-3-030-19609-7_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Conclusion

In: Putting Design Thinking to Work

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Ney

    (T-Systems International)

  • Christoph Meinel

    (University of Potsdam)

Abstract

This chapter, the conclusion, pulls together the different strands of the argument. First, the conclusion provides a brief review how Design Thinking, at least in theory, can create pathways for organisational transitions towards ‘messy institutions’. Second, the chapter reviews how DT implementation programmes fared in practice. In particular, the conclusion looks at whether implementation programmes brought about changes in each institutional dimension and whether these changes contributed towards making organisations more ‘messy’. Using the ‘feedback grid’, the chapter assesses what worked and what didn’t work. Moreover, the conclusion outlines the new insights as well as the new questions that emerge from this analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Ney & Christoph Meinel, 2019. "Conclusion," Understanding Innovation, in: Putting Design Thinking to Work, chapter 0, pages 169-192, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:undchp:978-3-030-19609-7_8
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-19609-7_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:undchp:978-3-030-19609-7_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.