IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/stechp/978-3-319-51213-6_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Some Lessons and Findings of this Study

In: Central Asia and the Silk Road

Author

Listed:
  • Stephan Barisitz

Abstract

This chapter summarizes some major points of the study and draws some conclusions. Thus, CA is seen as a unique global region of historic nomadic-sedentary interaction. Horseback nomads had the military edge over sedentary cultures and often dominated them in the course of almost two and a half millennia—up to the eighteenth century. The SR was a transcontinental trade network reaching from Europe via CA to India and China and existed for almost 2000 years. It featured three heydays: Han dynasty, Roman Empire (ca. 100 BCE–ca. 200 CE); Tang dynasty, Caliphate (ca. 675–875 CE); and Mongol Empire (ca. 1245–1345). Silk, horses, and other goods were traded in large quantities, but technological and cultural exchange was also intense. Transcontinental political stability may have been the most important factor favoring SR activity, while the spread of instability and warfare most often caused contractions of SR trade. Rising Western maritime competition on the routes to the Orient contributed to fatally eroding the overland network and indirectly weakening CA. The region enjoyed a degree of political or mercantile centrality in Eurasia up to the fifteenth century, followed by prolonged decline. In the nineteenth century, traditional CA and the SR were finally overrun by modernity (European colonialism). Throughout almost the entire premodern era, China stood out as the economically preeminent and most resourceful power along the SR.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephan Barisitz, 2017. "Some Lessons and Findings of this Study," Studies in Economic History, in: Central Asia and the Silk Road, chapter 5, pages 271-280, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stechp:978-3-319-51213-6_5
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-51213-6_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stechp:978-3-319-51213-6_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.