IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/stcchp/978-3-642-13875-1_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Acceptable representations

In: Strategic Social Choice

Author

Listed:
  • Bezalel Peleg

    (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem)

  • Hans Peters

    (University of Maastricht)

Abstract

In Chapter 3 we have studied the existence of Nash consistent representations of effectivity functions. We have, in fact, shown that the same conditions that guarantee existence of Nash consistent representations also guarantee the existence of weakly acceptable representations, that is, representations that always admit also Pareto optimal Nash equilibria – see Corollaries 3.6.2 and 3.6.3. In this chapter we investigate a subset of the set of Nash consistent game forms, namely the set of acceptable game forms, where a game form is acceptable if: (i) it is Nash consistent and (ii) for every profile of preferences every Nash equilibrium outcome is Pareto optimal. Acceptable game forms were introduced in Hurwicz and Schmeidler (1978). One of the main results of this chapter is a complete characterization of the effectivity functions which can be represented by an acceptable game form. Assuming that the set of social states is a compact Hausdorff topological space and restricting ourselves to continuous preferences we obtain the following result: an effectivity function for at least three players has an acceptable representation if and only if: (i) it has a Nash consistent representation and (ii) no two disjoint coalitions can veto the same alternative. (This follows from Theorem 4.3.1 and Remark 4.6.2. A precise formulation of the latter condition is (4.7).) This result is easy to understand but the proof is quite involved. We outline it here.

Suggested Citation

  • Bezalel Peleg & Hans Peters, 2010. "Acceptable representations," Studies in Choice and Welfare, in: Strategic Social Choice, chapter 0, pages 45-57, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stcchp:978-3-642-13875-1_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13875-1_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stcchp:978-3-642-13875-1_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.