IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/ssrchp/978-3-319-52425-2_22.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Decision Support Tool for Sustainable and Resilient Building Design

In: Risk and Reliability Analysis: Theory and Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Umberto Alibrandi

    (SinBerBEST – Singapore Berkeley Building Efficiency and Sustainability in the Tropics – Nanyang Technological University)

  • Khalid M. Mosalam

    (University of California)

Abstract

In this chapter, an integrated approach for a holistic (involving notions of safety, resiliency and sustainability) building design is presented to select the optimal design alternative based on multiple conflicting criteria under uncertainty. A probabilistic framework of the Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) is adopted, where MAUT is developed in conjunction with Performance-Based Engineering (PBE) approach, giving rise to a general framework, namely the PBE-MAUT. In PBE-MAUT different design alternatives may be ranked based on the expected utility. The discrepancies from the expected utility theory may be modelled through a risk-averse modelling of the utility functions based on the individual perceptions, or a more detailed description of the consequences valuable to the decision makers. Moreover, a risk-averse decision-maker towards extreme events can consider suitable quantiles or superquantiles. The distribution of the utility function is obtained from the First Order Reliability Method (FORM) which, through the design point, gives also the most critical realizations of the consequences for different degrees of risk aversion. The decision-making process is dynamic, in the sense that the optimal decision changes accordingly when new information is available. Such dynamic behavior is effectively represented using the Bayesian analysis, here modeled by combining PBE-MAUT with the Bayesian Network (BN). In this manner, the proposed framework represents a powerful Decision Support Tool (DST) for holistic building design. The BN, in conjunction with an array of sensors, can also be effectively used to determine the multi-criteria optimal decision considering the building lifecycle for a sustainable and resilient building design. The key features of the DST are demonstrated by an application to an office located on the Create Building, in Singapore.

Suggested Citation

  • Umberto Alibrandi & Khalid M. Mosalam, 2017. "A Decision Support Tool for Sustainable and Resilient Building Design," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Paolo Gardoni (ed.), Risk and Reliability Analysis: Theory and Applications, pages 509-536, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ssrchp:978-3-319-52425-2_22
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52425-2_22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wen, Tao & Gao, Qiuya & Chen, Yu-wang & Cheong, Kang Hao, 2022. "Exploring the vulnerability of transportation networks by entropy: A case study of Asia–Europe maritime transportation network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    2. Yang, David Y. & Frangopol, Dan M., 2019. "Life-cycle management of deteriorating civil infrastructure considering resilience to lifetime hazards: A general approach based on renewal-reward processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 197-212.
    3. Jamalnia, Aboozar & Gong, Yu & Govindan, Kannan & Bourlakis, Michael & Mangla, Sachin Kumar, 2023. "A decision support system for selection and risk management of sustainability governance approaches in multi-tier supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ssrchp:978-3-319-52425-2_22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.