IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sptchp/978-3-031-84853-7_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Fourth Phase of the Design Science Cycle: Evaluation

In: Design Science Methodology for the Management Sciences

Author

Listed:
  • Raymond Opdenakker

    (Eindhoven University of Technology)

  • Carin Cuijpers

    (Bureau Lara)

Abstract

After creating solution concepts during the creation phase, choosing for the specific solution concept based on criteria (as mentioned in Sect. 6.6 ), and elaborating the chosen solution concept, we will look here how to evaluate the solution concept(s). Two remarks have to be made here. In the first place, evaluation can already be considered during the creation phase. Venable et al. (2016) call this ‘ex ante evaluation’. Evaluation of the selected solution concept during the ‘evaluation phase’ is called ‘ex post evaluation’ (Venable et al., 2016). The second remark is that with evaluation, more in particular during the evaluation phase, we also validate the solution concept. Besides the evaluation forms presented in this chapter which serve as a validation for the solution concept, there are other validation methods, as presented in Chap. 10 , which can be seen as quality indicators for the conducted research. Concerning evaluation in design science research, categories distinguish the reasoning and strategies for evaluation, including when to evaluate, why to evaluate, and how to evaluate.

Suggested Citation

  • Raymond Opdenakker & Carin Cuijpers, 2025. "The Fourth Phase of the Design Science Cycle: Evaluation," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Design Science Methodology for the Management Sciences, chapter 7, pages 141-158, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sptchp:978-3-031-84853-7_7
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-84853-7_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sptchp:978-3-031-84853-7_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.