IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sptchp/978-3-031-63122-1_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Due Diligence and the Profit Motive: Perfect or Imperfect Duty?

In: Business Ethics: Kant, Virtue, and the Nexus of Duty

Author

Listed:
  • Richard M. Robinson

    (State University of New York – Fredonia (SUNY Fredonia))

Abstract

The pursuit of shareholder wealth is not a contractual obligation of management and therefore not a perfect duty. It is an imperfect duty that has practical limits that result from its trade-offs with other imperfect duties of due diligence. These imperfect duties of managerial due diligence are illustrated here through explanations of basic financial decisions: capital budgeting (the selection of long-term projects of the firm), capital structure (the selection of finance sources), and liquidity management. The ethical foundations of these imperfect duties of due diligence are drawn from Rawls’ criteria for “competent moral judges” and “considered moral judgments.” These are shown to depend on the imperfect duties to gather and utilize relevant knowledge as explained in Chaps. 3 and 4.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard M. Robinson, 2024. "Due Diligence and the Profit Motive: Perfect or Imperfect Duty?," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Business Ethics: Kant, Virtue, and the Nexus of Duty, edition 2, chapter 9, pages 159-177, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sptchp:978-3-031-63122-1_9
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-63122-1_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sptchp:978-3-031-63122-1_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.