IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-981-97-2902-9_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Image Classification: Evaluating Performance

In: Data-Driven Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Manohar Kapse

    (Symbiosis International (Deemed University))

  • N. Elangovan

    (CHRIST (Deemed to Be University))

  • M Lalkiya
  • Amruta Deshpande

    (Indira School of Business Studies, PGDM)

Abstract

Image classification plays a crucial role in various applications, and selecting the most effective machine learning algorithm is essential for achieving accurate results. In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of several well-known supervised machine learning techniques, including logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbours (kNN), naïve Bayes, decision trees, random forest, AdaBoost, and artificial neural networks (ANN). To assess the performance of these algorithms, we utilised different fonts of the English alphabet as our dataset and performed the analysis using the R programming language. We evaluated the algorithms based on standard performance criteria, such as the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC), accuracy, F1 score, precision, and recall. Our research findings demonstrated that the classification performance varied depending on the training size of the dataset. Notably, as the training size increased, neural networks exhibited superior performance compared to other machine learning techniques. Consequently, we conclude that neural networks and SVM are the most effective algorithms for image classification based on our study. By conducting this comprehensive analysis, we contribute valuable insights into selecting appropriate machine learning algorithms for image classification tasks. Our findings emphasise the significance of considering the training dataset size and highlight the advantages of neural networks and SVM in achieving high classification accuracy. This study provides valuable guidance for practitioners and researchers in choosing the most suitable machine learning algorithm for image classification, considering their specific requirements and dataset characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Manohar Kapse & N. Elangovan & M Lalkiya & Amruta Deshpande, 2024. "A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Image Classification: Evaluating Performance," Springer Books, in: Jeanne Poulose & Vinod Sharma & Chandan Maheshkar (ed.), Data-Driven Decision Making, chapter 0, pages 59-75, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-97-2902-9_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-97-2902-9_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-97-2902-9_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.