IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-981-97-1398-1_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Theoretical Debate Focus Regarding the Rightness of Institutional Transformation: Rethinking the Theory of Value and Conflict of the Two Economic Philosophies

In: Research on China’s Market Economy Development

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Liu

    (Renmin University of China)

Abstract

Is the institutional change under certain historical conditions progressive? Does it promote justice and civilization? This is an important controversial proposition. The answer to this question involves basic historical value orientation, basic class position and corresponding elementary interest requirements. The value theory of economics can provide the most systematic answer and the most profound explanation to this proposition. This is the reason why all kinds of debates about the profound changes in the system often end up returning to the basic problems and categories of value theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Liu, 2024. "Theoretical Debate Focus Regarding the Rightness of Institutional Transformation: Rethinking the Theory of Value and Conflict of the Two Economic Philosophies," Springer Books, in: Research on China’s Market Economy Development, chapter 0, pages 25-51, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-97-1398-1_2
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-97-1398-1_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-97-1398-1_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.