IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-981-19-3555-8_16.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Design of Learning Results According to International CDIO Standards as a Context for Improving Engineering Education at Agrarian University

In: AgroTech

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander V. Trukhachev

    (Stavropol State Agrarian University)

  • Alexey N. Bobryshev

    (Stavropol State Agrarian University)

  • Elena I. Kostyukova

    (Stavropol State Agrarian University)

  • Aleksandr V. Frolov

    (Stavropol State Agrarian University)

  • Eugenia V. Taranova

    (Stavropol State Agrarian University)

Abstract

The need for a meaningful transformation of the professional education of specialists in agroengineering specialization is due to both the increasing demands on the part of employers for the level of training of agricultural engineers, and the intensive development of agricultural technologies and equipment. The authors reveal the features of designing the planned learning outcomes for a qualitative update of the content of modern educational programs of engineering training in an agricultural university based on CDIO standards. The scientific novelty of the research is the development and methodological justification for designing learning outcomes according to international CDIO standards on the example of a separate area of professional training in the agricultural university (35.03.06 “Agroengineering”, specialization “Technical systems in agribusiness”). The article describes in detail the design of the results of the training according to international CDIO standards, based on the principles of “result-based” and “practice-oriented” by considering the interaction of the three factors determining the effectiveness of modern agricultural engineering training. These factors include: 1. Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education (FSES HE); 2. CDIO Syllabus (a content system or a list of employers’ requirements for engineering education in terms of attributes (competencies) and 3) the results of a stakeholder survey on the list of significant competencies of an engineering university graduate and their priority. Considering the CDIO approach as one of the leading advanced methods for the development, continuous improvement and evaluation of higher education programs in the field of engineering and technology, the authors propose a further algorithm for creating professional programs by defining the intended outcomes of the training. In the Stavropol State Agrarian University, 12 pilot programs have been developed and are being implemented in a similar way, based on the implementation of the approaches of the Worldwide CDIO Initiative. The result of the design and qualitative updating of educational programs based on CDIO standards will be the formation of a set of professional competencies in demand for graduates of an agricultural university of engineering specialization, allowing them to effectively perform professional tasks and function constructively in the conditions of innovative technological and technical development of agricultural production.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander V. Trukhachev & Alexey N. Bobryshev & Elena I. Kostyukova & Aleksandr V. Frolov & Eugenia V. Taranova, 2022. "The Design of Learning Results According to International CDIO Standards as a Context for Improving Engineering Education at Agrarian University," Springer Books, in: Elena G. Popkova & Anastasia A. Sozinova (ed.), AgroTech, pages 161-170, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-19-3555-8_16
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-3555-8_16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-19-3555-8_16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.