IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-981-16-2221-2_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Erosion and Coastal Structures in Brazilian Metropolises: The Case of Fortaleza and Its Inequalities

In: Practices in Regional Science and Sustainable Regional Development

Author

Listed:
  • Eduardo Lacerda Barros

    (Ceará State Secretariat of Environment (SEMA), Environment Chief Scientist Program)

  • Davis Pereira Paula

    (Ceará State University (UECE))

  • Renan Gonçalves Pinheiro Guerra

    (Ceará State Secretariat of Environment (SEMA), Environment Chief Scientist Program)

  • Jader Oliveira Santos

    (Ceará Federal University (UFC))

Abstract

In this chapter, we aimed to identify and analyze how the structures were designed to prevent the advance of the sea in each region of the city of Fortaleza, a capital in the Northeast of Brazil, and how they interacted with local arrangements (e.g., social, political, and economic). Coastal erosion is a natural process caused by multiple factors and may also result from anthropic interventions along the coastline and hydrographic basins. Fortaleza has undergone several changes imposed by coastal erosion, in which the initial responses were based on rigid structures. In the last 20 years, the form of intervention has changed; there has been a substantial investment in coastal protection solutions with the use of more sand, the so-called soft structures to contain the advance of the sea. The methodology applied was based on the analyses of academic documents, satellite images in association with the instruments from the Brazilian Coastal Management Program (GERCO), and the National Coastline Conservation Program (Procosta). The result shows that Fortaleza has passed and continuously been undergoing resignifications caused by changes in its coastline along its 294 years of its history, ranging from the first coastal structure in 1875 to the most recent in 2019. Today, along the 34 km of coastline was possible to identify 39 coastal structures. Recovery type of structures was identified in 62% of the total cases. At the same time, protection types appear in 38% of cases. It represents that about 60% of Fortaleza’s coastline is altered due to the installation of coastal protection and/or restoration structures. The majority of these interventions are concentrated in areas less noble in the city, in neighborhoods with some of the worst human development index (HDI) and have a high population and demographic density levels in the city. In contrast, we also observed an evident change in the conception of coastal structures installed in the city. When we analyze the coastal neighborhoods with some of the best HDIs, there was a concern to integrate the protection and recovery structures with the rehabilitation structures. We conclude that municipal, state, and federal public authorities must seek the best ways to manage such spaces, focusing on participative methodologies that consider environmental and social characteristics, promoting greater equality from the point of view of their economic and social use.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduardo Lacerda Barros & Davis Pereira Paula & Renan Gonçalves Pinheiro Guerra & Jader Oliveira Santos, 2021. "Erosion and Coastal Structures in Brazilian Metropolises: The Case of Fortaleza and Its Inequalities," Springer Books, in: R. B. Singh & Soumendu Chatterjee & Mukunda Mishra & Andrews José de Lucena (ed.), Practices in Regional Science and Sustainable Regional Development, pages 127-150, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-16-2221-2_6
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-2221-2_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-16-2221-2_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.