IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-981-16-1661-7_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Tombstone: A Most Influential Work

In: Telling the Truth: China’s Great Leap Forward, Household Registration and the Famine Death Tally

Author

Listed:
  • Songlin Yang

    (Henan Provincial Development Research Center)

Abstract

This chapter is devoted to the refutation of Yang Jisheng’s Tombstone, a book originally in Chinese but got translated into English because it is highly valued by commentators outside of China. Yang Songlin points out that Yang Jisheng’s “36 million famine victims” conclusion is not a result of mathematical computation at all but based on his review summing up of estimate by other witters. This chapter identifies where Yang Jisheng’s cherry-picking distorts evidence while ditching sources from the official data. Moreover, Yang uses a “blank-box” method—selecting death figures of provinces that he thinks useful for his argument and leaving the rest that does not support his number in blank. Examples of Yang Jisheng taking the number of total death of a particular place that he picks from, say, a county gazette, of the GLF period as the total famine toll, are aplenty.

Suggested Citation

  • Songlin Yang, 2021. "Tombstone: A Most Influential Work," Springer Books, in: Telling the Truth: China’s Great Leap Forward, Household Registration and the Famine Death Tally, chapter 0, pages 181-193, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-16-1661-7_11
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-1661-7_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-16-1661-7_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.