IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-981-15-8892-1_21.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Do Smart Cities Make Us Smarter ?—Philosophical Discussion on Over-Dependence on Smart-Phones in Our Cities

In: Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate

Author

Listed:
  • Ling Hin Li

    (The University of Hong Kong)

  • Lu Wang

    (China Road and Bridge Construction Corporation)

Abstract

In the recent decades, the term “smart city” has become more and more popular among researchers across a number of disciplines such as town planning, environmental studies, transport engineering and computer science. Most of the attention has been given to the application of technology into making our city more adaptable, sustainable and comfortable. However, we would like to raise a small question here amidst this wave of enthusiasm: Is smart city making us smarter, healthier and more active in other non-technological social aspects? Research attention given to topics with a pretext of “smart” has been growing in the last decade within higher education institutions as well as the society as a whole. Researching on any aspect with a pretext of “smart” is appealing these days because it is easy to get funding due to relatively clearly-defined deliverables of research outcomes in terms of technological advancement to be achieved from the study. On the other hand, how ordinary people should adapt to these fast moving “smart city” development so as to make our society more livable and amiable is a relatively less appealing topic as the deliverables are more difficult to define and measure. Hence, this aspect is usually relegated to a lower priority in most research agendas. In this paper, our objective is not to refute the importance of smart city concept. This paper is not an empirical analysis on the drawback of some smart city applications. We fully understand and appreciate the importance of smart city technologies to the various needs of urban development in any city. We wish, however, to raise the concern that smart city is developed to make human beings a more livable environment, but at the end, it is also human behaviour that determines how “livable” a society can be. In this paper, we will focus on the issues pertaining to the growing popularity of smart-phones which have become an indispensable part of our life in the development of smart cities. In this presentation, we would like to point out that while development of technological advancement for the sake of building smart cities is important and inevitable, more attention should also be given to the social responsibility of the general citizens in using these smart phones for the purpose of enjoying smart city outcomes. If smart cites are to be designed to make us smarter, we should be able to behave and live in a smarter way than before. By focusing on the use of smart phones in our cities, we would like to show that in reality, due to over-indulgence in these smart cities applications, the outcome could be the opposite, until we have learned to live in the smart way.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling Hin Li & Lu Wang, 2021. "Do Smart Cities Make Us Smarter ?—Philosophical Discussion on Over-Dependence on Smart-Phones in Our Cities," Springer Books, in: Gui Ye & Hongping Yuan & Jian Zuo (ed.), Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, pages 297-306, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-15-8892-1_21
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-8892-1_21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-15-8892-1_21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.