IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-981-15-8892-1_122.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Policy Evaluation of Construction Waste Resource Utilisation Based on S-CAD Method: Taking Shandong as an Example

In: Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate

Author

Listed:
  • Ruirui Zhang

    (Shandong Jian Zhu University)

  • Qijun Chen

    (Shandong Jian Zhu University)

  • Chaowei Li

    (Harbin Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Scientific policy evaluation is not only the measure of the effectiveness of policy implementation, but also the periodic summary of policy application, so as to provide a basis for subsequent policy revision. Taking Shandong province’s “Opinions on Further Strengthening the Management of Urban Construction Waste (CW) to Promote Resource Utilisation” as an example, this paper uses S-CAD method to deconstruct the values/stances, goals, strategies and expected results of the CW recycling policy from the perspective of Shandong provincial government and systematically evaluates the logicality of policy elements, the adequacy of resource input and the feasibility of policy implementation. Results show that the policy has a high logical consistency, and the policy design “effect” is good; the strategies are insufficient to achieve the goals, and the resource utilisation “efficiency” is low; the key “related views” are resistant to the policy, and the policy “benefit” is poor.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruirui Zhang & Qijun Chen & Chaowei Li, 2021. "Policy Evaluation of Construction Waste Resource Utilisation Based on S-CAD Method: Taking Shandong as an Example," Springer Books, in: Gui Ye & Hongping Yuan & Jian Zuo (ed.), Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, pages 1733-1751, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-15-8892-1_122
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-8892-1_122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-15-8892-1_122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.