IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-981-15-3977-0_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Re-Assessing Sustainable Urban Development from the Resident Perspective: A Case Study of Shanghai

In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate

Author

Listed:
  • Hongyun Si

    (Shandong University of Finance and Economics)

  • Daizhong Tang

    (Tongji University)

  • Quanwei Xu

    (Tongji University)

  • Guangdong Wu

    (Jiangxi University of Finance & Economics)

Abstract

The measuring method of sustainable development level based on urban official statistics is relatively objective, and an increasing number of countries have used it to assess government performance and city ranking. However, there is still no effective measures to make urban development more resilient and sustainable. This paper investigates the limitations of the existing urban sustainable development assessing methods and reassesses urban sustainability from the perspective of resident perception. First, we refined a six-dimensional evaluation index system by expert interview and literature review. Then, we used the method combining the entropy weight and cloud model to comprehensively measure the sustainability level of different regions in Shanghai. We found that the sustainable development level of the center city, new town, and suburb areas were classified between “middle” and “good”, while the suburb areas were closer to the “middle” level, and the center city, new town areas were closer to the “good” level. The highest sustainable level was found in the center city areas, which exhibited obvious heterogeneity and robustness. The new town’s sustainability level is the second, while it experiences the fastest development speed. From the perspective of the whole city, the resident perceived sustainability of economic living, social security, public service, city environment, and infrastructure have reached the “middle” level and above, with the best assessment for infrastructure. The exception is the perception related to public traffic. This study contributes a new angle of resident perception and the “entropy weight-cloud model” method for conducting an integrated assessment of urban sustainability. While revealing sustainable development level of the whole city, it can also help making a detailed comparative analysis of the sustainability differences from different regions and different dimensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongyun Si & Daizhong Tang & Quanwei Xu & Guangdong Wu, 2021. "Re-Assessing Sustainable Urban Development from the Resident Perspective: A Case Study of Shanghai," Springer Books, in: Fenjie Long & Sheng Zheng & Yuzhe Wu & Gangying Yang & Yan Yang (ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, pages 29-52, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-15-3977-0_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-3977-0_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-15-3977-0_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.