IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-662-46994-1_95.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Comparative Study of Engineering Construction Standardization Economic Benefit Evaluation Methods

In: Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate

Author

Listed:
  • Zhu Qiao

    (Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture)

  • Hong Zhang

    (Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture)

  • Fengjiao Sun

    (Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture)

Abstract

With the economic globalization, the function of standardization strategy is prominent, and many countries make standardization as one of the important strategic goals, in order to improve capability of independent innovation and core competitiveness. At present, the research on the evaluation of standardization economic benefit is hot and frontier. However, not unified evaluation methods make it difficult in comparing and analyzing the results of standardization economic benefit. This paper compares and analyzes the application scope, advantages and disadvantages of the method, in order to find the most appropriate research methods, providing the guidance for the research of standardization economic benefit.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhu Qiao & Hong Zhang & Fengjiao Sun, 2015. "Comparative Study of Engineering Construction Standardization Economic Benefit Evaluation Methods," Springer Books, in: Liyin Shen & Kunhui Ye & Chao Mao (ed.), Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 1149-1156, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-662-46994-1_95
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-46994-1_95
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-662-46994-1_95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.