IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-658-01171-0_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Reuse in Business Case Development: Arguments, Challenges and Guidelines

In: Supporting Reuse in Business Case Development

Author

Listed:
  • Bart-Jan van Putten

    (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin,SAP Research Dresden)

  • Nadja Schubert

    (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin,SAP Research Dresden)

  • Emilija Gjoncheska

    (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin)

Abstract

Reusing evaluation criteria and valuation methods is a promising way to make it easier to develop reliable business cases for IS investments. Better support for reuse can support the comparison and prioritization of business cases, can make it easier for decision makers to understand them and it can facilitate learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Bart-Jan van Putten & Nadja Schubert & Emilija Gjoncheska, 2013. "Reuse in Business Case Development: Arguments, Challenges and Guidelines," Springer Books, in: Supporting Reuse in Business Case Development, edition 127, chapter 3, pages 23-39, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-658-01171-0_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-01171-0_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-658-01171-0_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.