IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-658-00051-6_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Comparing the Usability of Graphical Modeling Languages Using FUEML

In: Usability Evaluation of Modeling Languages

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Schalles

Abstract

Documenting, specifying and analyzing complex domains such as information systems or business processes have become unimaginable without the support of graphical models. Generally, models are developed using graph-oriented languages such as Event Driven Process Chains (EPC) or diagrams of the Unified Modeling Language (UML). For industrial use, modeling languages aim to describe either information systems or business processes. Heterogeneous modeling languages allow different grades of usability to their users. In the following chapter an evaluation of four heterogeneous modeling languages and their different impact on user performance and user satisfaction is conducted [Schalles et al., 2012]. The evaluation is based on the FUEML framework, which was developed in chapter 4 of this thesis.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Schalles, 2013. "Comparing the Usability of Graphical Modeling Languages Using FUEML," Springer Books, in: Usability Evaluation of Modeling Languages, edition 127, chapter 6, pages 79-94, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-658-00051-6_6
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-00051-6_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-658-00051-6_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.