IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-658-00051-6_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Conclusion

In: Usability Evaluation of Modeling Languages

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Schalles

Abstract

In this thesis an empirical usability evaluation of four graphical modeling languages in business process and software modeling was conducted. First, the theoretical background of usability in the domain of graphical modeling languages was deduced. Based on this, a framework for usability evaluation of graphical modeling languages (FUEML) was developed. In the next step, the framework was applied in two empirical surveys analyzing the usability of four graphical modeling languages. In the following the most important results and findings of the research conducted in this thesis are summarized. The FUEML framework and the findings of the empirical surveys offer answers to all research questions defined in chapter one figure 1.1.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Schalles, 2013. "Conclusion," Springer Books, in: Usability Evaluation of Modeling Languages, edition 127, chapter 11, pages 153-157, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-658-00051-6_11
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-00051-6_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-658-00051-6_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.