IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-642-38433-2_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Pareto-Optimal Proportion Structure Criterion of Income Distribution

In: The 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management

Author

Listed:
  • Zhen He

    (Zhengzhou Institute of Aeronautical Industry Management)

Abstract

The two keys to whether the income distribution is reasonable are the distribution of active practice and the scientific judgment criterion. The current estimate criterion is almost based on their ‘own’ practices, which has no big guiding significance to the others. Based on Pareto optimality theory, this article gives the Pareto-optimal criterion for the proportion structure of income distribution: the Pareto-optimal theoretical criterion under fiver equal parts of the income strata with decreasing order is 60, 20, 11.7, 6.3, 2 %; the Pareto-optimal theoretical criterion of Gini Ratio or the concentration ratio is 0.57; the theoretical criterion of how the resource would be allocated and combined between the personal department and the public department should be 86.6:13.4 %. That criterion can judge whether the income distribution is reasonable and has the general guiding significance to the income distribution practice in the different countries and different regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhen He, 2013. "Pareto-Optimal Proportion Structure Criterion of Income Distribution," Springer Books, in: Ershi Qi & Jiang Shen & Runliang Dou (ed.), The 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 105-111, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-38433-2_12
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38433-2_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-38433-2_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.