IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-642-38391-5_102.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Heterogeneity of Institutional Investors and Investment Effects: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Securities Market

In: The 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Jin

    (Jinling Institute of Technology)

Abstract

With social security funds and securities investment funds as research objects, this paper makes an empirical study on cross-sectional data in the period 2008–2010 of listed companies of which the stocks are heavily held by institutional investors. Using property rights theory and agency theory, this paper verifies the following hypothesis: securities investment funds and social security funds face different political and social pressure, and have different payment mechanisms for managers, thus the fund owners may have conflict or convergence of interests with companies’ administration, which may affect contrarily the investment value of companies. This paper contributes by demonstrating the influence on companies’ investment effects of heterogeneity of Chinese institutional investors, which provides new evidence for judging, in the era of diversified institutional investors, the different roles of different institutional investors in corporate governance and performance, and offers supporting evidence for China to formulate development strategy for institutional investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Jin, 2013. "Heterogeneity of Institutional Investors and Investment Effects: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Securities Market," Springer Books, in: Ershi Qi & Jiang Shen & Runliang Dou (ed.), The 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 963-971, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-38391-5_102
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38391-5_102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-38391-5_102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.