IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-642-37270-4_35.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Study on Sewage Treatment BOT Project Concessionaire Selection Criteria: Best Practice from China

In: The 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management

Author

Listed:
  • Wei-hua Yang

    (Dalian Polytechnic University)

  • Ya-nan Yang

    (Dalian Polytechnic University)

  • Feng-hai Zhang

    (Dalian Polytechnic University)

  • Xiu-shan Wang

    (Dalian Polytechnic University)

Abstract

Concessionaire selection method has drawn much attention worldwide recently. The government of Dalian has developed well-structured concessionaire selection criteria in China. This paper analyzes and summarizes experience from this concessionaire selection practice to improve procurement efficiency of regions lacking such experience or methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei-hua Yang & Ya-nan Yang & Feng-hai Zhang & Xiu-shan Wang, 2013. "The Study on Sewage Treatment BOT Project Concessionaire Selection Criteria: Best Practice from China," Springer Books, in: Ershi Qi & Jiang Shen & Runliang Dou (ed.), The 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 365-372, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-37270-4_35
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-37270-4_35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-37270-4_35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.