IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-642-35548-6_125.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Comparative Study on Chinese and U.S. Evaluation Standards for Green Building

In: Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate

Author

Listed:
  • Jiamin Huang

    (China Resources Land (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd)

  • Jian Liu

    (Shenzhen University)

  • Cong Xiong

    (Shenzhen University)

Abstract

This study addresses the applicability of the national and international evaluation standards of green buildings to the green buildings in China. The Chinese and U.S. evaluation standards of green buildings were analyzed in detail. The Vanke Center that obtained the certificates of the U.S. LEED rating system and Chinese evaluation standard of green building (GB/T50378-2006) was introduced to specify the differences of the Chinese and U.S. evaluation standards of green buildings. The problems of the Chinese evaluation standard of green building were discussed, and some improvement suggestions were put forth.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiamin Huang & Jian Liu & Cong Xiong, 2014. "Comparative Study on Chinese and U.S. Evaluation Standards for Green Building," Springer Books, in: Jiayuan Wang & Zhikun Ding & Liang Zou & Jian Zuo (ed.), Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 1239-1244, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-35548-6_125
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35548-6_125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-35548-6_125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.