IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-642-04480-9_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Boundaries of Innovation and Social Consensus Building: Challenges for Japanese Firms

In: Dynamics of Knowledge, Corporate Systems and Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Akira Takeishi

    (Kyoto University (formerly Institute of Innovation Research, Hitotsubashi University) Yoshida-Honmachi)

  • Tsuyoshi Numagami

    (Hitotsubashi University)

Abstract

This paper addresses challenges for Japanese firms in innovation, drawing on a framework to categorize innovation by its boundary and our understanding of organizational characteristics of Japanese corporate systems. Innovation can be categorized into four levels by its boundary, that is, the scope of changes to be involved. Four levels are of innovation within component, innovation between components (within product), innovation between products (within market), and innovation between markets (within institution). When the boundary of innovation is limited, necessary coordination could be made within a small group of people. Japanese firms are more likely to succeed in such innovations, since they have advantage in frontline-led consensus building based on long-term employment and inter-firm relations. Once the boundary of innovation exceeds such limited scope, particularly across two or more different markets, however, political reconciliation of different interests or charismatic leadership is necessary to build a consensus among heterogeneous social actors.

Suggested Citation

  • Akira Takeishi & Tsuyoshi Numagami, 2010. "Boundaries of Innovation and Social Consensus Building: Challenges for Japanese Firms," Springer Books, in: Hiroyuki Itami & Ken Kusunoki & Tsuyoshi Numagami & Akira Takeishi (ed.), Dynamics of Knowledge, Corporate Systems and Innovation, chapter 0, pages 25-42, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-04480-9_2
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04480-9_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-04480-9_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.