IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-319-15696-5_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Towards an Evaluation Framework to Structure Business Intelligence Project Patterns as Enhancement of Business Intelligence Maturity Models

In: Business Intelligence for New-Generation Managers

Author

Listed:
  • Carsten Felden

    (Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg)

  • Claudia Koschtial

    (Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg)

  • Peter Chamoni

    (Universität Duisburg-Essen)

Abstract

Maturity models are introduced to support the evaluation of the status quo of IT inside a company and to identify next applicable steps, but it has been revealed that Business Intelligence (BI) maturity models are still in a learning phase so far. Existing models are not mainly based within practical environment, yet, so that the positioning of the own company’s status quo and comparison to competitors does not help in decision making in context of next steps in BI investments. We are analyzing several existing BI project descriptions, which were part of the TDWI BI Best Practice Award, to be able to contribute to the discussion of BI project definitions. Project patterns are identified, which are organized in a blueprint. This result serves as a first step and road sign towards a scalable BI management support, to increase the discussion about maturity models and to support BI strategies and investment decisions for project definitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Carsten Felden & Claudia Koschtial & Peter Chamoni, 2015. "Towards an Evaluation Framework to Structure Business Intelligence Project Patterns as Enhancement of Business Intelligence Maturity Models," Springer Books, in: Jörg H. Mayer & Reiner Quick (ed.), Business Intelligence for New-Generation Managers, edition 127, pages 67-76, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-15696-5_6
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-15696-5_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-15696-5_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.