IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-031-71814-4_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Sino-EU Investment Relations and Their Interdependencies

In: Sino-EU Economic Relations

Author

Listed:
  • René W.H. van der Linden

    (The Hague University of Applied Sciences)

  • Piotr Łasak

    (Jagiellonian University)

Abstract

Since the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, the EU’s foreign direct investments in China have declined somewhat compared to the previous decade, with a greater concentration of investments in certain sectors coming from a more limited number of European countries. This is partly the result of tensions with the US over semiconductor technology, concerns about increased anti-espionage activities and a more general stagnation of the Chinese economy with declining interest rates compared to those in the US and the EU. Conversely, China’s global foreign investment has recently fallen due to geopolitical tensions, the ongoing Sino-US trade and tech war, tighter outward capital controls, the Chinese government’s crackdown on its technology sector (e.g. Alibaba), and stricter screening of investments in the EU. The overall decline in Chinese investment in the EU has been accompanied by a recent surge of Chinese greenfield investment including electric vehicles above those of mergers and acquisitions at a much lower level than a few years ago. Before 2019, Sino-EU investment opportunities were discussed through a Comprehensive Investment Agreement (CAI) to strengthen cross-border economic ties between the two strategic markets in terms of market access, a level playing field, sustainable development, and a mechanism for the settlement of disputes between states. However, the more recent deterioration in EU–China relations has led to the suspension of ratification of the CAI. Since 2019 the European Commission has launched and adopted several instruments and regulations as part of the EU’s “de-risking” and Economic Security Strategy. They were aimed at improving capacities to deal with the increasing economic and geopolitical influence of China, whose government is increasingly prioritizing politics and national security over much-needed structural economic reforms. In contrast to the EU’s more defensive “de-risking” strategy, the more offensive Global Gateway Initiative (GGI), as a response to China’s Belt and Road Initiative, is more focused on leveraging specific EU infrastructure and connectivity programmes and diversifying supply chains to strengthen influence in the Global South at the expense of China.

Suggested Citation

  • René W.H. van der Linden & Piotr Łasak, 2024. "Sino-EU Investment Relations and Their Interdependencies," Springer Books, in: Sino-EU Economic Relations, chapter 0, pages 55-85, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-71814-4_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-71814-4_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-71814-4_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.