IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-031-63077-4_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Application of Machine Learning in the Prediction of Employee Satisfaction with Support Provided in a National Park

In: Tourism and Hospitality for Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Martha Chadyiwa

    (Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg)

  • Juliana Kagura

    (University of the Witwatersrand)

  • Aimee Stewart

    (School of Therapeutic Sciences, Faculty of Health Science, School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand)

Abstract

Employee satisfaction with support provided after an occupational injury in national parks has an impact on both the employee and the organisation. Machine learning (ML) classification provides techniques that can be useful in predicting employee satisfaction with the support provided after an occupational injury. The main objective of this study was to develop a model that can predict employee satisfaction with the support provided after an occupational injury in the Kruger National Park. The data were collected from 241 employees who experienced an occupational injury between 2006 and 2016 in the Kruger National Park in South Africa. Features used as inputs to the machine learning algorithm included employee characteristics such as job title, years of experience, salary, and performance evaluation. Finally, the nature of work, workload, job satisfaction, company culture, and opportunities for growth and development were also considered. The Support Vector Machines (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbours (k-NN), XGB Classifier, and the Deep Learning Neural Network (DNN) had a good performance in predicting employee satisfaction with the support provided. The k-NN, using training data with Random oversampling, had the highest overall accuracy of 71%. The model predicted employees who did not have adequate employee satisfaction with the support provided with a precision of 72%, a recall of 80%, and an f1-score of 76%. The XGB classifier with an f-score of 69% and the XGB classifier using data with random oversampling with an f1-score of 69% had the highest accuracy in predicting whether employees were adequately satisfied with the support provided. Discussion and conclusion: The findings suggest that both the XGB classifier without oversampling and the XGB classifier with oversampling techniques perform equally well in predicting whether employees are satisfied with the support provided. Therefore, management at the Kruger National Park can use these predictions to focus their interventions on the support provided to employees after an occupational injury to enhance employee satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Martha Chadyiwa & Juliana Kagura & Aimee Stewart, 2024. "Application of Machine Learning in the Prediction of Employee Satisfaction with Support Provided in a National Park," Springer Books, in: Emmanuel Ndhlovu & Kaitano Dube & Tawanda Makuyana (ed.), Tourism and Hospitality for Sustainable Development, chapter 0, pages 107-119, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-63077-4_6
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-63077-4_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-63077-4_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.