IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-031-62113-0_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Reply to Parr

In: William Godwin and Thomas Robert Malthus

Author

Listed:
  • David Reisman

    (University of Surrey)

Abstract

James Mackintosh, Samuel Parr and Malthus in the 1790s had all argued that Godwin had exaggerated the case for progress, republicanism and the withering away of the state. The French Revolution had failed. In his Reply (1801) Godwin refuted their key arguments. He continued to defend universal benevolence against those who said (with Adam Smith) that kindliness begins at home with family and friends. Godwin knew that he was frequently regarded as cold and rational. In the Reply he emphasised that emotion and feeling are an essential complement to rational choice. Perhaps reflecting his domestic happiness with Mary Wollstonecraft, he ceased to oppose marriage and the nuclear family despite their implications for property and the intergenerational transmission of privilege. His discussion of social subsistence is a reminder to Malthus that later marriage can be an investment in standing.

Suggested Citation

  • David Reisman, 2024. "The Reply to Parr," Springer Books, in: William Godwin and Thomas Robert Malthus, chapter 0, pages 183-195, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-62113-0_9
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-62113-0_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-62113-0_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.