IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-031-62113-0_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The End of the Debate

In: William Godwin and Thomas Robert Malthus

Author

Listed:
  • David Reisman

    (University of Surrey)

Abstract

Malthus reviewed Of Population in 1821 in the Edinburgh Review. He questioned the facts and said that it had no theory. In 1820 his own Principle of Political Economy revisited the arithmetical and geometrical ratios. In line with his 1815 essay, Malthus continues to predict an advance in cultivation towards the zero-rent margin. The prospects for the lower classes remained almost as bleak as in the Essay. This chapter examines his argument. It shows that a lack of aggregate demand was yet another reason, similar to Keynes, to be pessimistic about the future. It links his discussion of macroeconomics to social stratification and the three factors of production. The three classes contribute in different ways to consumption, saving and investment. The state can leverage on that difference through regulations such as the Corn Laws. The chapter concludes with an examination of Godwin’s Thoughts on Man (1831). In this, his final book, he revisits the topics of sense perception, memory and habit to show why he felt confident that looking forward through looking backward would give him a purchase on commerce, economics and the post-market culture.

Suggested Citation

  • David Reisman, 2024. "The End of the Debate," Springer Books, in: William Godwin and Thomas Robert Malthus, chapter 0, pages 213-244, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-62113-0_11
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-62113-0_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-62113-0_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.