IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-031-30203-9_32.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Wrong Conclusions from Incomplete Science: Dr. Mitchell Valdés-Sosa Discusses the NASEM Report on the “Havana Syndrome”

In: The Cuba Interviews

Author

Listed:
  • T. K. Hernández

Abstract

Part VIII is a collection of interviews with leaders from Cuba’s priority sectors: health, medical tourism, and biopharmaceuticals. This chapter is an interview with Dr. Mitchell Valdés-Sosa, an internationally respected neurologist, and the Director of the Center for Neuroscience (CNEURO) in Havana. The interview occurred immediately following the report by the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). It concluded that radio frequency wave exposure (microwaves) was the most plausible explanation for symptoms experienced by American and Canadian embassy staff in Havana. Cuba’s scientists called the conclusion “a very unlikely hypothesis” and “speculation not established science.” Unbeknownst to the scientists of the National Academy at the time was a secret report by the JASON group in 2018. The declassified report was obtained in September 2021 by BuzzFeed News reporter Dan Vergano through a Freedom of Information Act request. It concluded the cause of injuries was “highly unlikely” to have been microwave weapons or ultrasound beams but the mating calls of crickets and mass psychogenic effects. The Havana Syndrome story dominated the news and was the catalyst shaping the Trump campaign against Cuba, Florida politics, and attempts to crush the economy and foreign investment in Cuba.

Suggested Citation

  • T. K. Hernández, 2023. "Wrong Conclusions from Incomplete Science: Dr. Mitchell Valdés-Sosa Discusses the NASEM Report on the “Havana Syndrome”," Springer Books, in: The Cuba Interviews, chapter 0, pages 321-329, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-30203-9_32
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-30203-9_32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-30203-9_32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.