Author
Abstract
For a long time, bureaucracy was the main model for organising public authorities. All cases are administered equally and consistently by using a system of rules. In professional organisations like hospitals, courts and schools the professional organisation has also been influential. The professionals like medical doctors, university lecturers and teachers have had a lot of power in these organisations. The professionals have a long education and their work is characterised by a low division of labour. Their work is coordinated through standardisation of skills and knowledge, which the professionals develop through their common education and training. Work is also coordinated by mutual adjustment, often labelled collegiality, in a democratic decision-making process. Peer review is used for auditing and quality assurance. Since the 1980s however, politicians and public administrators have increasingly started to question the power of the professionals. New public management (NPM) was put forward as the new management model with the arguments higher efficiency and cost cutting. The private company competing on a market is seen as an ideal model in NPM. Customers, for example patients, should have the opportunity to choose between different alternatives. As a help to choose, units are compared by key performance indicators and customer satisfaction surveys. The division of labour and coordination are to some extent affected for the professionals by NPM. The line of command and top-down decision-making is emphasised. The collegial decision-making tends to be diminished, which for example has taken place in universities. The professionals also get more administrative tasks. The research results are mixed regarding the main argument for introducing NPM—improved efficiency, saving costs and increasing quality. However, a number of studies indicate increased costs overall, and lower quality, in the Weberian sense of treating cases equally and fairly. Also, several undesirable side effects are reported, such as grade inflation in Sweden. The schools are competing with grades to attract students. Several studies also point out stressful working conditions in organisations using NPM principles.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-21667-1_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.