IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-031-16640-2_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Friendship at Work: Inside the Black Box of Homophily

In: Understanding Workplace Relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Ajay Mehra

    (University of Kentucky)

  • Diane Kang

    (University of Kentucky)

  • Evgenia Dolgova

    (Erasmus University)

Abstract

What explains friendship at work? The answer according to the homophily principle is that friendships are more likely among individuals who are similar. Classic work on homophily assessed similarity in terms of both demographic indicators and underlying cognitive perceptions. Organizational researchers, however, have tended to rely on a narrower, structural interpretation of homophily, one that assumes that perceptions of similarity can be bypassed because demography is a good proxy for these underlying perceptions. Using data from an organization located in North America, we open the black box of homophily and submit this assumption to empirical test. There was no support for the idea that the relationship between gender and friendship choice is mediated by underlying cognitive perceptions of similarity. We found, instead, that similarity in gender and perceptions of similarity were independently related to friendship choice. We also found evidence of heterophily when it comes to self-monitoring personality: the greater the difference in the self-monitoring scores of two individuals, the more likely they were to be friends. We close by discussing implications for theory and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Ajay Mehra & Diane Kang & Evgenia Dolgova, 2023. "Friendship at Work: Inside the Black Box of Homophily," Springer Books, in: Alexandra Gerbasi & Cécile Emery & Andrew Parker (ed.), Understanding Workplace Relationships, pages 369-389, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-16640-2_12
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-16640-2_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-16640-2_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.