IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-97971-3_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Fathers Obtain Less Workplace Support Than Mothers for Caregiving

In: Caregiving Fathers in the Workplace

Author

Listed:
  • Jasmine Kelland

    (University of Plymouth)

Abstract

This chapter explores the notion that caregiving fathers in the workplace receive less support than their female counterparts. It begins by charting the current knowledge which identifies the ways in which organisations provide workplace support for parents with emphasis on the experiences of fathers. In particular, it explores literature which outlines workplace outcomes when fathers challenge the purported social norms by seeking more flexible working patterns to enable an active role in the caregiving of their children. The data obtained within the qualitative element of the ‘Fatherhood Forfeit Study’ are focused upon within this chapter and illustrative quotes from study participants are employed to explore the workplace perceptions and experiences of caregiving fathers. Emphasis is placed upon data grouped under the overarching theme of ‘Fathers obtain less workplace support than mothers for caregiving’. Due to the vast amount of data collected within this theme, a sub-theme has been created entitled ‘Support is conditional and subject to negotiation for fathers’ which specifically explores the contingent nature of workplace support for fathers which is suggested to be more negotiable than the support offered to mothers.

Suggested Citation

  • Jasmine Kelland, 2022. "Fathers Obtain Less Workplace Support Than Mothers for Caregiving," Springer Books, in: Caregiving Fathers in the Workplace, chapter 0, pages 67-79, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-97971-3_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-97971-3_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-97971-3_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.