IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-92096-8_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Interests of (In)frequent Bike Users: Analysis of Differing Target Groups’ Needs Concerning the RouteMeSafe Application

In: iCity. Transformative Research for the Livable, Intelligent, and Sustainable City

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Silberer

    (Hochschule für Technik Stuttgart)

  • Greta Dangel

    (Universität Ulm)

  • Thomas Bäumer

    (Hochschule für Technik Stuttgart)

  • Patrick Müller

    (Hochschule für Technik Stuttgart)

  • Georgios Kotziabassis

    (SPACEGOATS)

Abstract

Cycling is an emission-free and healthy mode of transportation. However, the share of cycling in the modal split is still low. Perceived safety during cycling could be a reason for that. The RouteMeSafe application is developed at Stuttgart University of Applied Sciences with the aim of tackling this issue. A safety routing function is supposed to increase the short-term safety of cycling by showing safe paths for cyclists. Long-term safety is supposed to be increased with the feedback function enabling cyclists to share their evaluation of the cycling infrastructure with the city administration. The safety routing function is currently in the design phase and the feedback function in prototype phase. To develop the application user-friendly, target groups for both functions need to be defined and their expectations considered in the development process. Two studies with infrequent and frequent cyclists have been conducted to do so. Study 1, a user experience study based on a student sample, showed that infrequent cyclists could be a target group for the safety routing function and frequent cyclists could be a target group for the feedback function. The latter was confirmed in study 2, a technology acceptance study based on a sample with frequent cyclists of Stuttgart. Future studies on the application should investigate the long-term technology acceptance of the two groups. This could help to find out whether both groups can serve as target groups on the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Silberer & Greta Dangel & Thomas Bäumer & Patrick Müller & Georgios Kotziabassis, 2022. "Interests of (In)frequent Bike Users: Analysis of Differing Target Groups’ Needs Concerning the RouteMeSafe Application," Springer Books, in: Volker Coors & Dirk Pietruschka & Berndt Zeitler (ed.), iCity. Transformative Research for the Livable, Intelligent, and Sustainable City, chapter 2, pages 15-26, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-92096-8_2
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-92096-8_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-92096-8_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.