IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-87273-1_19.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Design of Robotic Care: Ethical Implications of a Multi-actor Perspective

In: Service Design Practices for Healthcare Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Čaić

    (Aalto University)

  • Stefan Holmlid

    (Linköping University)

  • Dominik Mahr

    (Maastricht University)

  • Gaby Odekerken-Schröder

    (Maastricht University Tongersestraat 53)

Abstract

The topic of ethically-sound robotic design is timely and societally relevant as service robots have roles with increasingly social demands in diverse service contexts. Robots fill caregiving roles for vulnerable consumers, including older adults and children. This chapter presents an empirical study investigating social and ethical ramifications of robotic elderly care from the perspective of those receiving and those providing care. Consequently, 36 actors (i.e., older adults, informal, and formal caregivers) were interviewed through generative phenomenographic interviews. This approach leveraged data-rich narratives and informant-made visualizations of future networks of care to uncover their expectations and concerns. A multi-actor perspective on the ethical implications of robotic care is captured with three thematic maps built around: (1) assistance, (2) monitoring, and (3) companionship. The results indicate that care robots could improve the wellbeing of older adults and wider care-providing networks through service, constant presence, and increased reliability. However, the visualizations of future robotic care uncovered informants’ latent fears, in addition to ethical concerns found (e.g., decline in agency, loss of privacy, and delusion). For example, formal caregivers who emphasized that they do not fear robots replacing their jobs would not place the robot close to the older person in the visualization of future care constellations. This suggests that although formal caregivers tend to give “desirable” responses in interviews, they are still reluctant to accept robots as care co-providers.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Čaić & Stefan Holmlid & Dominik Mahr & Gaby Odekerken-Schröder, 2022. "Design of Robotic Care: Ethical Implications of a Multi-actor Perspective," Springer Books, in: Mario A. Pfannstiel & Nataliia Brehmer & Christoph Rasche (ed.), Service Design Practices for Healthcare Innovation, chapter 0, pages 381-398, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-87273-1_19
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-87273-1_19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-87273-1_19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.