IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-87269-4_14.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Risk and Return of Equity, the Capital Asset Pricing Model, and Stock Selection for Efficient Portfolio Construction

In: Quantitative Corporate Finance

Author

Listed:
  • John B. Guerard Jr.

    (McKinley Capital Management, LLC)

  • Anureet Saxena

    (McKinley Capital Mgmt, LLC)

  • Mustafa N. Gültekin

    (University of North Carolina Chapel Hill)

Abstract

Individual investors must be compensated for bearing risk. It seems intuitive to the reader that there should be a direct linkage between the risk of a security and its rate of return. We are interested in securing the maximum return for a given level of risk, or the minimum risk for a given level of return. The concept of such risk-return analysis is the efficient frontier of Harry Markowitz (1952, 1959). If an investor can invest in a government security, which is backed by the taxing power of the federal government, then that government security is relatively risk-free. The 90-day Treasury bill rate is used as the basic risk-free rate. Supposedly, the taxing power of the federal government eliminates default risk of government debt issues. A liquidity premium is paid for longer-term maturities, due to the increasing level of interest rate risk. Investors are paid interest payments, as determined by the bond’s coupon rate, and may earn market price appreciation on longer bonds if market rates fall or losses if market rates rise. During the period from 1928 to 2017, Treasury bills returned 3.44%, longer-term (10-year Treasury) government bonds earned 5.15%, and corporate stocks, as measured by the stock of the S&P 500 index, earned 11.53% annually, as measured by the mean annual return. The annualized standard deviations are 3.06%, 7.72%, and 19.66%, respectively, for Treasury bills, Treasury bonds, and S&P stocks. The risk-return trade-off has been relevant for the 1928–2017 period. The correlation coefficient between annual returns for Treasury bills and the S&P 500 stock returns were −0.030 for the 1928–2017 time period. This was essentially no correlation between Treasury bills and large stocks, as measured by the S&P 500 stock. The correlation coefficient between annual returns for Treasury bonds and the S&P 500 stock returns was 0.30 for the 1928–2017 time period. Why do corporate stocks offer investors higher returns for stocks than bonds?

Suggested Citation

  • John B. Guerard Jr. & Anureet Saxena & Mustafa N. Gültekin, 2022. "Risk and Return of Equity, the Capital Asset Pricing Model, and Stock Selection for Efficient Portfolio Construction," Springer Books, in: Quantitative Corporate Finance, edition 3, chapter 0, pages 403-460, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-87269-4_14
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-87269-4_14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-87269-4_14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.