Author
Abstract
This chapter delineates and argues for the ex ante economic efficiency of the “distortion-analysis” protocol this study uses to assess the economic efficiency of choices. This protocol has three distinctive features. First, it instructs the analyst to consider the impact of the choice whose economic efficiency is at issue on the magnitudes of many categories of economic inefficiency that conventional economic-efficiency analyses ignore (including the economic inefficiency generated by resource allocations between alternative quality-or-variety-increasing-investment [QV-investment]-creating uses, between alternative production-process-research [PPR]-executing uses, among alternative unit-output-producing, QV-investment-creating, and PPR-executing uses, and among alternative final consumers). Second, it instructs the analyst to predict the impact of the choice under review on many individual categories of economic inefficiency (resource misallocation) by estimating the choice’s impact on the amount of resources devoted to the associated category of resource allocations, by estimating the profits/losses that would be generated by the choice-elicited/deterred resource allocation, by developing formulas for the difference between the profits yielded by and the economic efficiency of (the “distortion” in the profits yielded by) the individual exemplars of a relevant category of resource allocations, by estimating the post-choice magnitudes of the parameters in those formulas (primarily Pareto imperfections), and by combining the conclusions of the preceding analyses. Third, the protocol contains a subprotocol for determining the ex ante economic efficiency of doing any economic-efficiency-analysis-relevant work (which takes account not only of the direct allocative cost of such efforts but also of the allocative cost of the government’s financing such efforts) and instructs the analyst to do all that work but only that work whose performance is ex ante economically efficient.
Suggested Citation
Richard S. Markovits, 2021.
"The Study’s TBLE Distortion-Analysis Protocol for Economic-Efficiency Analysis,"
Springer Books, in: Welfare Economics and Antitrust Policy - Vol. I, chapter 0, pages 123-176,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-79812-3_8
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-79812-3_8
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-79812-3_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.