IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-77291-8_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Evaluation of Management Effectiveness of the System Based on the Use of Management Indicators

In: Economic Issues of Social Entrepreneurship

Author

Listed:
  • Marat R. Usmanov

    (LUKOIL-Nizhegorodniinefteproekt LLC)

  • Ekaterina P. Garina

    (Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University)

  • Elena V. Romanovskaya

    (Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University)

  • Natalia S. Andryashina

    (Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University)

  • Dmitrii P. Vatletsov

    (Nizhny Novgorod Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA)

Abstract

Modern enterprise of high-tech industries of the Russian Federation has traditionally presented a set of technological objects. Whose activities are characterized by multiple and usually non-linear relationships, as well as validation of the raw materials and products, which determines the impossibility of forming once certain systems to improve the efficiency of enterprises with assessment and control of the progressive technological development of business units through the introduction of lean thinking principles in production. The purpose of research is to evaluate the development of corporate systems for domestic production in the context of the formation of a systematic approach to continuous improvement. As well as the implementation of a system of evaluation and monitoring of the effectiveness of their work. Also, to draw conclusions about the rationality of used solutions, and to form reserves assessment of further development for companies. Materials and methods: Systematization and generalization of the experience in continuous improvements of the company on the example of the business sector identified in the study; assessment of continuous improvement system potential in the context of monitoring business parameters, the effectiveness of continuous improvement, and the achievability of strategic goals. Results: The toolkit for assessing the development of systems for improving efficiency in the context of the practical application of the system management model through continuous improvement was determined on the example of “Processing” business sector of a domestic company. Features of managing the environment of changes or attributes that determine the degree of their output from the introduction of a system of continuous improvements are highlighted. The object of the study is a separate business unit of the “Processing” sector of the fuel and energy complex of the Russian Federation. The practical significance lies in the possibility of using the highlighted solutions as a tool for effective management for an industrial enterprise or corporate agglomerations.

Suggested Citation

  • Marat R. Usmanov & Ekaterina P. Garina & Elena V. Romanovskaya & Natalia S. Andryashina & Dmitrii P. Vatletsov, 2021. "Evaluation of Management Effectiveness of the System Based on the Use of Management Indicators," Springer Books, in: Elena G. Popkova & Bruno S. Sergi (ed.), Economic Issues of Social Entrepreneurship, pages 77-85, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-77291-8_8
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-77291-8_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Chursin & Andrew Boginsky & Pavel Drogovoz & Vladimir Shiboldenkov & Zhanna Chupina, 2024. "Development of a Mechanism for Assessing Mutual Structural Relations for Import Substitution of High-Tech Transfer in Life Cycle Management of Fundamentally New Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-77291-8_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.