Author
Abstract
At the very beginning of the 1990s, the primary purpose of setting up the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange was to raise funds to save moribund SOEs. This policy, favored by the Communist Party of China (CPC) and the Chinese government, has led to the fact that state-controlled listed companies have constituted the overwhelming majority in comparison with private listed companies in the above two stock exchanges. By the end of 2006, there were 998 state-controlled companies and 405 private companies listed on the two stock exchanges. In addition to the listing numbers, Table 2.1 shows the ratios of the market capitalization of state-controlled listed companies issuing A shares in the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange to that of A shares of the two stock exchanges from 1995 to 2005. According to the data in Table 2.1, it is clear that state-controlled listed companies are almost the synonym of A shares in mainland China. Likewise, Table 2.2 displays the ratios of the annual IPO numbers of state-controlled listed companies issuing A shares in the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange to those of A shares of the two stock exchanges from 1993 to 2006. In terms of the statistics in Table 2.2, it is fair to say that A-share markets in mainland China principally serve SOEs to be listed and to raise funds as the initial intention to develop Chinese stock markets. Taking into consideration the huge difference between the market capitalization of A-share markets and that of B-share markets in China, it is legitimate to reach the conclusion that state-controlled listed companies have dominated Chinese stock markets. Meanwhile, the socialist regime and long-term tradition of state ownership have also made the CPC and Chinese government focus on state-controlled listed companies which are the backbone of the Chinese state-owned economy. Therefore, in this book, the corporate governance of Chinese listed companies is confined to that of state-controlled listed companies because they have much more clout to influence the distribution of resources and the design of institutions due to their economic and political advantages in China.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-67572-1_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.