IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-42458-9_15.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Case Study 5: A Paradox of the UNESCO “World Heritage” Label? The Case of the Way of St James of Compostela in France

In: Overtourism

Author

Listed:
  • Frédéric Dosquet

    (ESC Pau Business School)

  • Thierry Lorey

    (Kedge Business School Bordeaux)

  • Stéphane Bourliataux-Lajoinie

    (Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers Paris)

  • Josep Lluís Olmo Arriaga

    (Abat Oliba CEU University)

Abstract

The objective of this chapter is to highlight the paradox of labeling in the tourism field, and this, in the perspective of sustainable tourism. Indeed, if the label helps to save tourist sites by a lack of notoriety and therefore attendance, it causes inconvenience related to overtourism. This is particularly the case of the “World Heritage of UNESCO” label. In fact, by definition the tourist sites benefiting from this label are fragile or even threatened, but the labeling can generate an over-satisfaction damaging to the sustainability of the site in question. Obtaining the label for this tourist destination has allowed to revive an ancestral heritage born in tenth century, but at the same time engendered nuisances related to over-frequentation by tourists and pilgrims to the point of running the risk of a denaturation of the spirit of this pilgrimage.

Suggested Citation

  • Frédéric Dosquet & Thierry Lorey & Stéphane Bourliataux-Lajoinie & Josep Lluís Olmo Arriaga, 2020. "Case Study 5: A Paradox of the UNESCO “World Heritage” Label? The Case of the Way of St James of Compostela in France," Springer Books, in: Hugues Séraphin & Tatiana Gladkikh & Tan Vo Thanh (ed.), Overtourism, pages 267-284, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-42458-9_15
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-42458-9_15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-42458-9_15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.