IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-24784-3_15.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Twisted Debate

In: The Quest for a Divided Welfare State

Author

Listed:
  • John Lapidus

    (University of Gothenburg)

Abstract

The lobbyists for privatization and semi-privatization find it difficult to convince people of its beneficial effects. Further, as a lobbyist for a divided welfare state, it is very hard to win an argument with the opponent. The result is a twisted debate. A debate that avoids factual matters. A debate that uses the ABCs of lobbying, among other things, by combating fictitious opponents and ignoring the most obvious facts. The chapter gives examples of this kind of debate methods, and it debunks some of the myths that are associated with them. Further, the chapter shows how the quest for privatization and semi-privatization has a long history, even though it has sometimes been said to be a consensus on keeping Swedish healthcare publicly funded.

Suggested Citation

  • John Lapidus, 2019. "The Twisted Debate," Springer Books, in: The Quest for a Divided Welfare State, chapter 0, pages 209-222, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-24784-3_15
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-24784-3_15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-24784-3_15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.