IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-1-4614-3043-8_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Conclusion

In: Information Theory and Best Practices in the IT Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Sanjay Mohapatra

    (Xavier Institute of Management)

Abstract

Benchmarking is necessary for an organization to improve its performance. Results from benchmarking benefit all stakeholders (such as customers, shareholders, employees, and environment) who can measure benefits in quantitative terms such as customer through faster delivery of projects, shareholders through returns on their investment, employees through increase in their salary, and environment through investment in social projects. Out of many parameters that can be used to measure improvement in performance, productivity, and defect density are primarily measured in every organization. These two measures are also used for setting aggressive goals for year on year improvement and reap further benefits. In this research work, productivity and defect density have been studied in detail and in order to improve their values further, factors affecting these two parameters have been studied in detail. Conclusions made from these studies are presented here.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanjay Mohapatra, 2012. "Conclusion," Springer Books, in: Information Theory and Best Practices in the IT Industry, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 185-190, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-4614-3043-8_7
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3043-8_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-4614-3043-8_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.