IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/spochp/978-3-031-76047-1_13.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Applications of Improvements to the Pythagorean Won-Lost Expectation in Optimizing Rosters

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander F. Almeida

    (Georgetown University)

  • Kevin Dayaratna

    (Georgetown University)

  • Steven J. Miller

    (Williams College)

  • Andrew K. Yang

    (University of Cambridge)

Abstract

Bill James’ Pythagorean formula has for decades done an excellent job estimating a baseball team’s winning percentage from very little data: if the average runs scored and allowed are denoted by RS $$\mathrm {RS}$$ and RA $$\mathrm {RA}$$ , respectively, there is some γ $$\gamma $$ such that the winning percentage is approximately RS γ ∕ ( RS γ + RA γ ) $$\mathrm {RS}^\gamma / (\mathrm {RS}^\gamma + \mathrm {RA}^\gamma )$$ . One important consequence is to determine the value of different players to the team, as it allows us to estimate how many more wins we would have given a fixed increase in run production. We summarize earlier work on the subject and extend the earlier theoretical model of Miller (who estimated the run distributions as arising from independent Weibull distributions with the same shape parameter; this has been observed to describe the observed run data well). We now model runs scored and allowed as being drawn from independent Weibull distributions where the shape parameter is not necessarily the same and then use the Method of Moments to solve a system of four equations in four unknowns. Doing so yields a predicted winning percentage that is consistently better than earlier models over the last 30 MLB seasons (1994 to 2023). This comes at a small cost as we no longer have a closed-form expression but must evaluate a two-dimensional integral of two Weibull distributions and numerically estimate the solutions to the system of equations; as these are trivial to do with simple computational programs, it is well worth adopting this framework and avoiding the issues of implementing the Method of Least Squares or the Method of Maximum Likelihood.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander F. Almeida & Kevin Dayaratna & Steven J. Miller & Andrew K. Yang, 2025. "Applications of Improvements to the Pythagorean Won-Lost Expectation in Optimizing Rosters," Springer Optimization and Its Applications,, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:spochp:978-3-031-76047-1_13
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-76047-1_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:spochp:978-3-031-76047-1_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.