IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/spbrcp/978-981-10-1959-3_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Conclusion

In: Explaining Productivity Differences

Author

Listed:
  • Hiromichi Shibata

    (Yokohama National University)

Abstract

Productivity and work practices show only limited convergence across the Japanese mother plant and the U.S., Thai, and Chinese transplants. Productivity gaps between the mother plant and the U.S. transplant and productivity differences between the Thai and Chinese transplants still remain at 10 %. Production workers’ skills that are integrated with troubleshooting skills in Japan contrast with production workers’ skills separated from troubleshooting skills in the United States, Thailand, and China. Decision-making by assistant first-line supervisors based on trusting relationships with workers in Japan differs from supervisors’ limited control over workers and frequent worker initiated job transfers (by individual choice) in the United States, Thailand, and China. Manufacturing engineers at the mother plant play full/linking roles, including involvement in production line design innovation and production method development, whereas manufacturing engineers at the U.S., Thai, and Chinese transplants play partial/limited roles. One of the main reasons for the differences is the key characteristic of “integration with employment stability” in Japan versus “independence with job instability” in the United States, Thailand, and China, these being influenced by embedded social norms and institutional factors. Also influential is the reluctance of Japanese managers to transfer successful work practices developed at the mother plant to its transplants.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiromichi Shibata, 2016. "Conclusion," SpringerBriefs in Business, in: Explaining Productivity Differences, chapter 0, pages 45-56, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:spbrcp:978-981-10-1959-3_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-1959-3_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:spbrcp:978-981-10-1959-3_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.