IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/spbrcp/978-3-319-18179-0_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Conceptualising Customer Expectations with Complaint Channels

In: Complaint Management and Channel Choice

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Garding
  • Andrea Bruns

Abstract

This chapter outlines the theoretical framework of the empirical studies. Five main factors are identified which guide the conceptualisation of customer satisfaction with complaint channels: procedural justice, interactional justice, distributive justice, personal attitudes and social interactions. Each factor is described in detail and related to one of the underlying scientific theories: justice theory, attribution theory and behaviour theory. As a next step, these factors are linked to the five complaint channels (mail, e-mail, phone, face-to-face, social networks) in order to allow for subsequent empirical testing of customers’ perceptions. Based on this methodology, the adequacy of complaint channels can be tested from a customer perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Garding & Andrea Bruns, 2015. "Conceptualising Customer Expectations with Complaint Channels," SpringerBriefs in Business, in: Complaint Management and Channel Choice, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 27-33, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:spbrcp:978-3-319-18179-0_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-18179-0_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:spbrcp:978-3-319-18179-0_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.