IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/spbchp/978-981-10-0257-1_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Multidimensionality and Preferences for Income Equality

In: Political Determinants of Income Inequality in Emerging Democracies

Author

Listed:
  • Takeshi Kawanaka

    (Japan External Trade Organization)

  • Yasushi Hazama

    (Japan External Trade Organization)

Abstract

Multidimensionality resulting from ethnic fractionalization is more prevalent in emerging democracies compared with advanced democracies. Ethnic fractionalization hampers the formation of public opinion favoring income redistribution from the better-off to the worse-off. This occurs because although resource transfers to the poor within the same ethnic group can be supported, transfers to the poor from other ethnic groups will be resisted. Previous studies indicated that ethnic fractionalization reduces preferences for income equality; however, they included both emerging and advanced democracies in the same samples. This approach raises concerns about a spurious relationship, particularly because emerging democracies, on an average, have higher ethnic fractionalization and weaker preferences for income equality than advanced democracies. This chapter focuses only on emerging democracies to test the impact of ethnic fractionalization upon individual preferences for income equality. The multilevel analysis, applied separately to the last two waves of the World Values Survey, reveals that ethnic fractionalization primarily reduces preferences for income inequality, although the relationship is nonlinear. The fact that this relationship was observed when the lower-income group status was controlled for suggests that in ethnically heterogeneous societies, resistance to resource transfers to out-groups is deeply embedded, thus cutting across class lines. These results lend qualified support to the conventional understanding of ethnic heterogeneity and preferences for income equality.

Suggested Citation

  • Takeshi Kawanaka & Yasushi Hazama, 2016. "Multidimensionality and Preferences for Income Equality," SpringerBriefs in Economics, in: Political Determinants of Income Inequality in Emerging Democracies, edition 1, chapter 0, pages 57-74, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:spbchp:978-981-10-0257-1_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-0257-1_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:spbchp:978-981-10-0257-1_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.