IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/socchp/978-3-030-86468-2_25.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Egypt’s 2011 Revolution: A Demographic Structural Analysis

In: Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century

Author

Listed:
  • Andrey Korotayev

    (HSE University
    Lomonosov Moscow State University
    Russian Academy of Sciences
    Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Julia Zinkina

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University
    Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

Abstract

At the end of January 2011, Mubarak faced such a combination of long-, medium- and short-term factors that he had no way to counter: (1) The explosive growth of the population of educated youth (caused by both the drop in mortality against the background of still high birth rates in the early years of Mubarak’s rule and the rapid expansion of higher education) led to the emergence of a huge mass of unemployed (or inadequately employed) educated young people concentrated to a high degree in the capital. (2) The rapid and rather bloodless fall of the authoritarian regime of Ben Ali, which was brilliantly and talentedly broadcasted by Arab satellite channels, provoked the leaders of the already existing liberal secular dissident (mostly youth) groups, structured primarily through the Facebook groups “the April 6 Youth Movement” and “We are all Khaled Said”, to make a similar attempt in Egypt. It was the educated youth who acted as the strike force that launched mass protests. (3) The second wave of agflation (2009-2011) led to a rapid rise in food prices, which contributed to the fact that the masses of Egyptian commoners, who were brought by explosive price growth below the poverty level, joined the impact force of the Arab Spring—unsettled highly educated youth. (4) All this took place against the backdrop of an acute intra-elite conflict that broke out between the military and the economic elite (headed by Gamal Mubarak), as a result of which the military elite decided to use popular protests to liquidate (at least, politically) its main opponent, and refused to suppress protests, which ensured their unexpected and rapid “success.” (5) To this one should add a purely internal (but typologically quite natural for partial autocracies) factor. A very important role in the genesis of the Egyptian protest tsunami was played by a flagrant violation by the Egyptian authorities in November–December 2010 of the informal rules of the game with regard to the Muslim Brotherhood, who were running candidates as ‘independents’ in the 2010 Parliamentary elections. As a result of particularly large-scale falsifications, the authorities managed to block almost completely the entrance of the Brotherhood’s representatives into the Egyptian parliament. As a result, having deprived the Muslim Brotherhood of the opportunity to conduct its political activities legally, the Egyptian authorities actually “pushed” the Muslim Brotherhood into Tahrir, forcing them to switch from legal (and semi-legal) opposition activities to protest activities. In turn, the joining of the protests by the Muslim Brotherhood (with their colossal practical experience of organizational work) gave the protests an incomparably greater scope and organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrey Korotayev & Julia Zinkina, 2022. "Egypt’s 2011 Revolution: A Demographic Structural Analysis," Societies and Political Orders in Transition, in: Jack A. Goldstone & Leonid Grinin & Andrey Korotayev (ed.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century, pages 651-683, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:socchp:978-3-030-86468-2_25
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:socchp:978-3-030-86468-2_25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.