IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/seschp/978-3-030-49410-0_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Linkages Between Cognitive and Behavioral Competences to Assess the Organizational Dominant Logic

In: Intrapreneurship and Sustainable Human Capital

Author

Listed:
  • Jesús Manuel Palma-Ruiz

    (Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua)

  • Ana M. Serrano-Bedia

    (University of Cantabria)

  • M. Concepción López-Fernández

    (University of Cantabria)

Abstract

Throughout the years, the concept of dominant logic has gained interest in management due to its recognized potential for strategic analysis in organizations. However, a literature review reveals the need yet to strengthen an operationalization approach to assess the dominant logic of organizations. Thus, the first objective of this chapter is to advance our understanding of this concept by exploring the cognitive and behavioral elements addressed in the literature. As a result, key elements have been identified to assess the dominant logic of organizations. The second objective of this paper is to estimate the relationships between the firms’ performances as a function of the cognitive and behavioral competences of dominant logic, pointing out the importance of showing linkages between cognition, behavior, and organizational outcomes. Multiple linear regression (MLR) analyses were employed based on a sample of 281 high-performing firms from Mexico. In our view, this study contributes to the relevance of human capital and how it translates into an organizational dominant logic with implications to organizational outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesús Manuel Palma-Ruiz & Ana M. Serrano-Bedia & M. Concepción López-Fernández, 2020. "Linkages Between Cognitive and Behavioral Competences to Assess the Organizational Dominant Logic," Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics, in: João Leitão & António Nunes & Dina Pereira & Veland Ramadani (ed.), Intrapreneurship and Sustainable Human Capital, edition 1, pages 67-83, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:seschp:978-3-030-49410-0_5
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49410-0_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:seschp:978-3-030-49410-0_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.