IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/semchp/978-3-031-68479-1_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Diagrammatic Depiction of the Rottenberg Invariance Proposition

In: Principles and Paradoxes of Sports Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Dennis Coates

    (University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC))

Abstract

The sports economics literature traces virtually all of its active research agenda to issues raised by Simon Rottenberg in his seminal article “The Baseball Players’ Labor Market.” One issue, perhaps the single most examined issue, is the extent to which the equilibrium outcome in the sports labor market is invariant to alternative institutions in that market. In what has come to be known as the invariance proposition, Rottenberg states:By implication, the invariance proposition implies that the outcomes of the sporting competition under the reserve rule distribute wins about as a free market in player labor would. A natural development of the literature was the assessment of alternative league policies, like salary caps and revenue sharing, for what they implied for the distribution of wins among the teams in the league. Rod Fort, alone and with various coauthors, is one of the most prominent contributors to the literature addressing these issues. A further natural extension of this line of research to which Rod is a major contributor concerns whether the league can select a policy that produces the optimal competitive balance. The purpose of this paper is to present a new diagrammatic model, the profit opportunity frontier, that may be used to address many of these insights.

Suggested Citation

  • Dennis Coates, 2024. "A Diagrammatic Depiction of the Rottenberg Invariance Proposition," Sports Economics, Management, and Policy, in: Stefan Szymanski (ed.), Principles and Paradoxes of Sports Economics, pages 43-55, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:semchp:978-3-031-68479-1_5
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-68479-1_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:semchp:978-3-031-68479-1_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.