IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prochp/978-3-319-51124-5_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Empirical Study III: Organizational Adoption of User Innovation Inputs

In: Online Intermediaries for Co-Creation

Author

Listed:
  • Christoph W. Künne

    (University of Erlangen-Nuremberg)

Abstract

Chapter 5 deals with the third empirical study that switches the perspective of analysis to the beneficiaries of OIIs and co‐creation: the HCOs. To improve the HCO innovation performance, the integration of external knowledge artifacts from OIIs lacks understanding. The organizational adoption process of such knowledge artifacts plays an important role here and Rogers' theory on innovation adoption is applied. Through an in‐depth single case study in the medical device industry, this study provides a refined process model of the organizational adoption of consumer generated knowledge artifacts. This model helps to explain why great innovation inputs from end users do not necessarily surface in finalized product innovations.

Suggested Citation

  • Christoph W. Künne, 2018. "Empirical Study III: Organizational Adoption of User Innovation Inputs," Progress in IS, in: Online Intermediaries for Co-Creation, chapter 0, pages 119-143, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:prochp:978-3-319-51124-5_5
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-51124-5_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prochp:978-3-319-51124-5_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.